How Did You Get to That Conclusion?!

OK, back story, briefly. I posted this screen shot of someone's tweet on our Instagram page. The guy who responded... it's a confusing account, but I think it is multiple people running it and none of them agree on anything. The only reason I even followed back was because one of the people in the account has been a consistent follower of ours. Anyway, here is the screen shot:

As of right now, they haven't responded, so website fodder it is. If I get a clarification, I'll update this. 

Now, I spent way too much time staring at this. I read the graphic and the response over and over again, because I was convinced I must have missed something somewhere or read it incorrectly. That's why my response was just, "What?" 

It seems everyone else who has dropped by has gotten what the graphic was saying. However, I can't figure out how the above graphic could be misconstrued into a 4 year old finding sexual interest in a cat. There was nothing mentioned about sex, sexual orientation, or sexualizing either the child or a cat. 

So, dude, you know who you are. Could you explain this to me, please? Because the implied reasoning here is obviously far away from what you got it out of it, and I might need a road map to find you.